<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005">
<channel xmlns:cfi="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005/internal" cfi:lastdownloaderror="None">

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright cf:type="text">2010</copyright>
<title cf:type="text">Fallacy Files</title>
<description cf:type="text">A weblog for the Fallacy Files website.</description>
<link>http://www.fallacyfiles.org/</link>


<item>

<title xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="text">Blurb Watch: &quot;Man on a Ledge&quot;</title>

<description xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="html">The new movie Man on a Ledge has had some trouble with the critics: its Metacritic Metascore is 40 out of 100, which technically means &quot;Mixed or Average Reviews&quot;, but one point less and it would be &quot;Generally Unfavorable Reviews&quot;.  Similarly, it scores a rotten 32% on Rotten Tomatoes' Tomatometer.  So, what's an adwriter to do for a blurb?  Contextomy to the rescue!  An ad for the movie has the following blurb....</description>

<link>http://www.fallacyfiles.org/archive022012.html#02032012</link>

</item>


<item>

<title xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="text">A Lapalissade</title>

<description xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="html">From an Agence France-Presse report...</description>

<link>http://www.fallacyfiles.org/archive012012.html#01282012</link>

</item>


<item>

<title xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="text">Mixed-Up Logic Check</title>

<description xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="html">If you pay attention to the news, you might be excused for thinking that President Obama has increased the national debt much more than his predecessors in office.  However, a bar graph put out by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi's office, and later used by the liberal group MoveOn, purports to show that Obama has increased the debt less than each of the four previous presidents, and the three Republican presidents--Reagan, Bush pere, and Bush fils--each increased the debt more than either of the Democrats--Clinton and Obama....</description>

<link>http://www.fallacyfiles.org/archive012013.html#01262012</link>

</item>


<item>

<title xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="text">Debate Watch</title>

<description xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="html">The umpteenth--I've lost count--debate of the candidates for the Republican nomination for President, moderated by journalist Bret Baier, was held in South Carolina a few days ago.  The following transcript has been heavily edited to keep it on topic, but also to omit hesitation, repetition, stumbling over words, and one apparent mistranscription...</description>

<link>http://www.fallacyfiles.org/archive012012.html#01192012</link>

</item>


<item>

<title xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="text">Name that Fallacy!</title>

<description xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="html">Philip Plait from Bad Astronomy on star-naming...</description>

<link>http://www.fallacyfiles.org/archive012012.html#01162012</link>

</item>


<item>

<title xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="text">Reader Review: Critical Inquiry</title>

<description xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="html">Patricia Heil sends in the following review....</description>

<link>http://www.fallacyfiles.org/archive012012.html#01082012</link>

</item>


<item>

<title xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="text">Fact Checkers are Sacred</title>

<description xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="html">James Taranto is back with another criticism of fact-checking.  A few years ago, he took a shot at the fact checkers, and I thought it a clear miss.  This time he hits the mark.  Check it out, it's worth reading....</description>

<link>http://www.fallacyfiles.org/archive012012.html#01052012</link>

</item>


<item>

<title xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="text">Q and A</title>

<description xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="html">Q: I am having difficulty in categorizing one logical fallacy that has come up this fall, and would appreciate your thoughts.  When Warren Buffett indicated that he thinks that the rich should bear a heavier portion of the tax burden, many commentators then issued a rebuttal along the lines of, &quot;Well, Mr. Buffett can go ahead and just write a larger check to the IRS,&quot; without ever discussing the merits of Mr. Buffett's arguments.</description>

<link>http://www.fallacyfiles.org/archive012012.html#01032012</link>

</item>


<item>

<title xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="text">Poll Watch</title>

<description xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="html">Reporters like to cover polls as if they were horse races because races are more dramatic than dull numbers.  According to the current coverage, Romney is in the lead as the field rounds the final turn heading towards the Iowa caucus, Paul is running a close second, and Santorum is pulling up on the outside.  If a political campaign is like a horse race, then it's a horse race on a foggy morning when you can only catch occasional glimpses of the horses through the fog, and often can't tell which is ahead....</description>

<link>http://www.fallacyfiles.org/archive012012.html#01012012</link>

</item>


<item>

<title xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="text">Pop Quiz 2</title>

<description xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="html">If you choose a single answer to this question at random from among the five possible answers below, what is the probability that you will select the correct answer?  1. 20%, 2. 40%, 3. 100%, 4. 20%, 5. 0%...</description>
 
<link>http://www.fallacyfiles.org/archive122011.html#12312011</link>

</item>


<item>

<title xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="text">Yet Another Side to the Story</title>

<description xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="html">In an article in The Guardian newspaper, Neil Clark criticizes the late Václav Havel and those who praise him....</description>

<link>http://www.fallacyfiles.org/archive122011.html#11282011</link>

</item>


<item>

<title xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="text">New Book: An A to Z of Critical Thinking</title>

<description xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="html">An A to Z of Critical Thinking, edited by Beth Black, is a new dictionary of terms used in critical thinking.  I haven't read the whole book yet, but I was able to read some of the entries listed under the letter A using Amazon's preview function.  The sample entries were very clearly written and quite accurate, though I could perhaps quibble about a few things.  So, assuming this sample, though not random, to be representative of the quality of entries in the book, it should be excellent.  Judging from the incomplete &quot;List of Entries&quot; in the back of the book, most of the standard fallacies have entries....</description>

<link>http://www.fallacyfiles.org/archive122011.html#12262011</link>

</item>


<item>

<title xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="text">Lose Your Illusions</title>

<description xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="html">Freeman Dyson has an interesting, anecdote-filled, review of Daniel Kahneman's new book Thinking, Fast and Slow.  This part caught my attention....</description>

<link>http://www.fallacyfiles.org/archive122011.html#12212011</link>

</item>


<item>

<title xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="text">Obituary: Christopher Hitchens</title>

<description xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="html">Christopher Hitchens, author of Why Orwell Matters among many other books and essays, has died at the much too young age of 62.</description>

<link>http://www.fallacyfiles.org/archive122011.html#12162011</link>

</item>


<item>

<title xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="text">Check it Out</title>

<description xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="html">Discover Magazine has an article worth reading on systematic mistakes people make about risk....</description>

<link>http://www.fallacyfiles.org/archive122011.html#12152011</link>

</item>


</channel></rss>

