What are the Fallacy Files?
I began collecting and studying logical fallacies about twenty-five years ago, when I first became interested in logic. This collection took two forms:
- A collection of named fallaciessuch as "ad hominem"that is, types of bad reasoning which someone has thought distinctive and interesting enough to name and describe. This collection took the form, primarily, of the study and acquisition of books and articles on the named fallacies, especially textbooks and reference books. You can find individual files on the named fallacies via the Taxonomy of Logical Fallacies, or from the alphabetical index in the scroll bar to your left.
- A collection of fallacious, or otherwise bad, arguments, that is, examples of reasoning which may commit one or more of the named fallacies under 1, or are bad in some way yet to be classified. This collection took the form of clippings from newspapers, magazines, pamphlets, photocopies of pages of books, andin a few rare casesentire articles or books which were rich sources of bad reasoning. I have used selections from my collection as examples in many of the files on named fallacies, and additional examples can be found in the file: Stalking the Wild Fallacy.
Some years after I began to amass these files, I wondered just what I ought eventually to do with them, how best to organize the information within them, and in what form to make them available to others interested in fallacy studies. The present hypertext web version, The Fallacy Files, was first published on March 11th, 2001, and is the result of this score of years of research and fieldwork on the fallacies.
Praise for the Fallacy Files
|The Fallacy Files is on the Top Ten from:|
You can contribute fallacies and examples to the files by sending them to me. Examples that can be documented in some way are preferable to anecdotes. Comments, questions, and suggestions are also always welcome.
The Fallacy Files is an Amazon Associate and every time you click on a link to Amazon and make a purchase, the Fallacy Files will receive a small commission. All money received through this program will be used to help keep the site free of charge, and to add more content. If you find this site useful, please help support it by clicking on a link belowor any other link to Amazon from this siteand making a purchase. If you plan to make a purchase from Amazon anyway, please consider doing so through a link from this site. You won't pay a penny more for your purchase, and you will help keep this project going. Thank you for your support!
Any examples sent to The Fallacy Files or questions asked may be used in entries, the weblog, or other features. I will acknowledge the contributor of examples or questions unless otherwise instructed. If you do not want a submission attributed to you, please let me know in the email in which you send it. I try to answer all email, but due to the volume―especially of spam―and other responsibilities, I may be slow in doing so. I appreciate your taking the time and trouble to write.
Advertisements help support the continuing mission of The Fallacy Files to rid the universe of fallacious arguments, and readers can help support that mission by visiting those advertisers. However, The Fallacy Files does not endorse the products or books advertised on this site.
I provide Amazon links to books for a number of reasons: Sometimes I endorse the books, but sometimes I link to a book that I disagree with so that readers can easily check what I say about it. This is an extension of the scholarly practice of citing sources, since sometimes the easiest, fastest, or only way to check a citation to a book is to purchase it. Other times I link to books that I haven't read or disagree with so that readers can find an alternative point of view. Thus, an Amazon link to a book should not be taken as an endorsement, but any purchase you make through such a link will help support The Fallacy Files. Thank you for your continued support!
If you are interested in advertising to a smart readership interested in logical fallacies, cognitive biases, statistical errors, logic puzzles, and new books on these and related issues, please let me know.